InvestorsHub Logo

RollinPennies

11/10/17 7:36 PM

#190337 RE: dounome #190336

Lovely. $$$

GenericGatsby

11/11/17 2:41 AM

#190350 RE: dounome #190336

If royalties are agreed to be paid then the cash payment itself will probably not be too overbearing so as to not ruin Entrust and jeopardize the royalties down the road. This could set the precedent for the rest of the infringers. The immediate, less substantial cash payments will allow for our team to fully pursue the domino effect without the bashers ever getting the chance to complain about who is paying Blank Rome's check in the interims between wins. All the while, royalties will continue to be set up and collected which will only serve to make the company an even greater buyout opportunity for larger firms.

If no royalties are in the deal then expect a significantly larger cash payment into SFOR's Victory Vault. This could be to fully fill up the war chest before taking down all the rest with the intention of obtaining less cash outright from them, but more in the long run through more lucrative royalty deals. Otherwise, just getting the highest number possible for this lawsuit in outright cash obtained by payment would make the story that much more palatable to prospective buyers. Win big on the first one to get the name out there and draw everyone's attention in, and then start winning more to trigger the feeding frenzy.

Both strategies are viable, but in the end it won't matter because a buyout has been Mr. Kay's goal for a good little while now, and that is exactly what this all builds towards.

Remember ladies and gentlemen, "Greatness is an everyday affair." -The GenericGatsby

pennies4beer

11/11/17 6:12 AM

#190356 RE: dounome #190336

Just gonna have a little fun with this, but what's the difference between this case and the other 6?

Virginia....the "Rocket Docket"!!!!!!

Selfishly, it does bum me out a little that the Secureauth case was moved to CA.

Oh well. Meanwhile, it sure does look like DUO has dug their heels in pretty deep. I don't have full access to pacer, but when I see this: AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: scheduling a Status Conference (ECF#113) 12/1/2017 10:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Mark Falk, all Fact Discovery shall be completed by 2/1/2018, any dispositive Motions shall be filed by 5/31/2018; etc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark Falk on 10/30/17. (sr, ) , I guess they figure they've come this far and there'e no turning back (complete arrogance IMO). We could very well see a verdict with "treble" in this case.

Oh how sweet that would be!!!