InvestorsHub Logo

otterman

11/10/17 3:21 PM

#147896 RE: brojazzy #147894

WRONG. Its not an opinion. They've been through the revocation process and its in the judges hands. That's a fact.

An opinion might be what I think the result will be, but its FACT that they've been through the revocation process.

Opinion: Have they done more than most companies, Yes.

Opinion: Have they done the bare minimum to show good faith, Yes.

Fact: The SEC lawyer has been able to show and in some cases prove that the company has not changed their tune. Youd best read that document if you haven't and not rely on posts here.

IMO theyre still closer to being toast than becoming current.

Fact: Their last know good filing stated both that they did, and did not, have N.A. operations. Someone is Lying!

Fact: They stated that they did not own any shares to give to Asher. That has not been proven to be false. Another lie.

Please do state all of the abundant evidence in their favor that I have not covered. That would be factual and not according to someones posts.

Keep in mind that I have heaps of other negative facts but Im quite tired of posting them.

rbtree

11/10/17 4:18 PM

#147907 RE: brojazzy #147894

Yawn.. The hearings are to determine the terms of the revocation, which is pretty much pre-determined.

They waited too long to get current. Too late now.