Replies to post #189744 on Zerify Inc (ZRFY)

[diligentcpa]

I am excited about the future and am ready for these developments to hopefully take place.

[Gold49er]

At least there's proof I was not Lyin

Bo has always been outspoken.

Ahhh, Play it again Sam !

[SmallBuy]

i certainly like this synopsis!

[4sleddogs]

You've changed my opinion with all the references you posted in your last response to me about Texas Pacific Group. It, not Singapore Telecom is now the most likely future buyer of SFOR in my mind thanks to your clear & concise logic. You also helped me to recall that Bloomberg TV interview with a TPG exec this spring after the McAfee spinoff. The Bloomberg reporter asked him what were TPG's plans for the rest of the year. He replied "We will continue to acquire small software companies in the computer security landscape". SFOR IMHO fits that acquisition target description nicely. Thank you for changing my thinking on this subject with the power of your DD!

[riskreward007]

Re: Speculation about possible buyouts:

To your point of a company (like TPG) possibly acquiring both ACS and SFOR:

If you were a company wanting to dominate in the cybersecurity market, what good would it do you to acquire only ACS, -since the only products they sell are SFOR's?

And why would you want to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to acquire ACS without also acquiring SFOR, -since SFOR's patents are the basis of what makes ACS valuable?

To guarantee your own company's future success it appears that you would need to buy out and own BOTH ACS and SFOR!

Possible double buyout, -an intriguing thought!