Replies to post #494415 on Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[2221]

you saying So… this document would give us a idea of how many Assets still need to be liquidated ($ 272,361,413,177) and a idea of how many are currently being liquidated ($ 26,430,109,191)… .....so for all this years just 26 b + has beed liquidated so how long will take to liquidat 272B + ????????

[xoom]

Good analysis WW

[stoxjock]

Awesome DD...and great Posts... Now, I have more hope for "F&R' unless the Hedgies & KKR find some way to steal them all away from us...Thanks Very Much & GLTU!

[hotmeat]

Nice analysis and interpretation of actual facts. Wish more posts could be like your two offerings.

Thank you.

[gg4]

You've done it again, probably took as long as I was sick!! THANK YOU AGAIN!!

[Thundergulch]

Is this money that WMIH would receive, or is it $$$,$$$,$$$.$$ headed for escrow ?

[hotmeat]

I've read and re-read your posts a couple times and have to admit that the FDIC's accounting is highly DUBIOUS, to say the least. I honestly believe you're onto something here in that I can see the argument for $15-$30B in excess WAMU Estate Assets.

[ron_66271]

Thank You wwhatthe

for the Great DD.


And things get even bigger when one considers "willful misconduct", and 3X for DAMAGES.

Docs; #5885, #1997 PDF 435..., Rotella got $20MM.


and nine years of ABS CERT Trust accumulation held in WMIIC's Bank accounts.

Keep up the Good work A&M. NUNC PRO TUNC.

Def;
Nunc Pro Tunc

[Latin, Now for then.] When courts take some action nunc pro tunc, that action has retroactive legal effect, as though it had been performed at a particular, earlier date.

The most common use of nunc pro tunc is to correct past clerical errors, or omissions made by the court, that may hinder the efficient operation of the legal system. For example, if the written record of a trial court's judgment failed to correctly recite the judgment as the court rendered it, the court has the inherent power to change the record at a later date to reflect what happened at trial. The decision, as corrected, would be given legal force from the time of the initial decision so that neither party is prejudiced, or harmed, by the error. The purpose of nunc pro tunc is to correct errors or omissions to achieve the results intended by the court at the earlier time.