Replies to post #90174 on Bots Inc (BTZI)

[longhaul4]

Love this post!!!!!

[MD-420]

There are two different games that can be played on the otc. One is using toxic debt for a quick cash in while baiting and maintaining operations. The other is using a large share structure to do a slow bleed while baiting and using a business model that keeps cost down to avoid toxic financing.

Mcig keeps costs down buy being a distributor with low profit margins. They issue shares in order to book to book revenue while giving the majority of it back to give the impression of solid revenue. They buy things from insiders in order to enrich insiders.

Tell me, why doesn't mcig have a general contractors license?

[BubbaInSC]

An Interesting Thing About "Character"

I noticed that you didn't use the word "honest" or "transparent" in your characterization of your employer.

Some would say that one can tell a lot about a man by the company he keeps. Like Nomm and Robert McNulty.

I Can Understand Why MCIG Is Intentionally NOT Divulging The Exact Location of the land

They need to continue to bait anything MJ, right?

And it's got nothing to do with a competitor stealing MCIG's "territory". That was hysterically funny.

At the end of the day, the move was strictly to prevent the bleeding from the drop in pps due to the Kern County ban.

BUT, pps would have skyrocketed had they divulged the exact location of the land and it could be independently verified by ANY SHAREHOLDER that it isn't in a banned area.

EPIC Fail for Mardikian and Paul to gain trust of its shareholders.

Why is MCIG intentionally hiding the exact location of the land in Kern County.

And, why aren't you placing a disclaimer at the end of every post?
IMO, that's a clear example of MCIG's legacy of lack of transparency.





I believe Robert McNulty is second from left, and Paul is 3rd from left?

Having traded micro cap stocks for some time, I can tell
you Paul Rosenberg is in a league of his own.
Not mistake proof, but, his absolute 100% commitment and
loyalty to his shareholders.

Which is why he refuses to take on toxic debt, and refused to
take a salary or liquidate any shares for the first few years
of operation.
Instead, he used his own shares and at times, his own finances
to keep MCIG afloat.

Those companies I mentioned are riddled with toxic debt, and
some of those CEO's sold millions shares, enriching themselves,
their wives, and other insiders.

If you really knew him, you wouldn't be making those kind of
criticisms.
~Heed

[1vman]

*****Hilarious ! Paul is committed ? Really ? Well i called and the message i received on their answering machine is not that of a legitament company !

ENOUGH SAID THERE !