InvestorsHub Logo

BubbaInSC

11/02/17 6:34 AM

#90181 RE: MD-420 #90177

Worth A Second Read - Thanks MD-420

Like paying insiders $3.5 Mil for CR(APP). Notice a holding company was used to keep CR(APP) assets. No way to tell who really owned the CR(APP) assets - but the 420C* domain; which Paul owned was part of that. That transaction didn't even include the underlying businesses. Worst of all CR(APP) failed its proof of concept w/ Weed* and 420j*.

And MCIG is going to divvie CR(APP); which generated $0 revs last quarter. Great way to do a slow bleed and reward insiders.....again.

VTCQ and OMHE was the result of that FAIL

There are two different games that can be played on the otc. One is using toxic debt for a quick cash in while baiting and maintaining operations. The other is using a large share structure to do a slow bleed while baiting and using a business model that keeps cost down to avoid toxic financing.

Mcig keeps costs down buy being a distributor with low profit margins. They issue shares in order to book to book revenue while giving the majority of it back to give the impression of solid revenue. They buy things from insiders in order to enrich insiders.

Tell me, why doesn't mcig have a general contractors license?