InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

boardbrain1

11/01/17 8:00 PM

#102902 RE: Myth #102900

What deal could Red Oak have made with the CCEL lawsuit silence? For a Hedge Fund it looks like they don't know how to make money, but could use this issue to off set taxes...why not...they aren't making us any MONEY.

Red Oak needs to give us much better guidance, for a investment for the shareholders this BOD needs to get the BOOT just like Matty boy and the Ice Cream SCUMBAG Clowns.

The math says we were all RED today and we are heading lower.

GL Longs
icon url

worthylion

11/01/17 10:39 PM

#102904 RE: Myth #102900

Since CCEL is over a 5% holder and filer, I think they would have to file if their last filed position increased or decreased more than one percentage point. In any case don't see how pushing the price around in any way messes with Red Oak. All that matters is whether Red Oak can find a buyer willing to pay more than CCEL for the recurring revenue. Based on some of CCEL's share purchases, they seem willing to pay at least .006 per share for control. If someone else doesn't step up Red Oak eventually will have to sell to CCEL, but CCEL can only wait unless they choose to do a hostile tender which is expensive and risky.
icon url

locksflooring

11/02/17 10:19 AM

#102908 RE: Myth #102900

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! CBAI SHARES ARE TOILET PAPER!