Support: 888-992-3836
Copyright © 2023 InvestorsHub Inc.
Replies to post #316404 on Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)
geocappy1
11/01/17 1:58 PM
#316409 RE: JamesGMS #316404
bigbro1
11/01/17 2:05 PM
#316414 RE: JamesGMS #316404
JamesGMS Tuesday, 08/23/16 07:52:24 PM Re: stoneroad post# 270746 Post # 270749 of 316268 Go Stone, re your post below: Quote: Hutchins won't move the needle. Wolchok will. Wolchok most certainly will move the needle - you can take that to the bank : ) James
JamesGMS Tuesday, 09/06/16 02:48:00 PM Re: stoneroad post# 271625 Post # 271627 of 316268 Go Stone, re your post below: Quote: Perhaps next we get trials funded by AZN. From what we're hearing today's announcement represents just the tip of the iceberg - there is much more to come - which should shortly put all the RS discussion to rest for good. Enjoy the week. James
JamesGMS Monday, 09/26/16 01:51:19 PM Re: CloakedProtector post# 273372 Post # 273413 of 316268 Go CP, good information today. Re your post below: Quote: JJ, Dr. Garnick was on the last PPHM Quarterly and CC. Dr. Garnick (and Dr. Brekken) are amongst those Scientists that invest in PPHM. Dr. Garnick will not be gone soon, he said he is not in this for the money and I believe him. The Dr. Garnick gone and alike statements surface each time PPHM makes progression and something is upcoming. It becomes predictable. Just wanted to confirm your statement highlighted above in red - as Rob already has a net worth in excess of that of PPHM {at the moment anyway and only for a short while longer} so he's most definitely not "in this for the money" - for him, now, and for that matter all the way back before his very first approval, it's always been about the science and making people's lives just a little better - or perhaps now, orders of magnitude better. Here we go : ) James
JamesGMS Wednesday, 09/28/16 06:13:32 PM Re: 4OurRetirement post# 273746 Post # 273748 of 316268 Go 4Our, re your post below: Quote: So, IF ESMO Presentation Confirms Phase2 Results Validity... Then, very simply PPHM could see $5/share without any other news... but personally, I think more news is coming! From what we continue to hear - the "if" has been removed from the equation. Re your $5.00/share forecast - that wouldn't be unreasonable at first - but you are correct - it appears much much more is coming. Here we go : ) James
JamesGMS Sunday, 03/19/17 07:44:59 PM Re: stoneroad post# 291758 Post # 291772 of 316268 Go Stone, re your post below: Quote: I think we are close to both a Bavi and exosomes partnership. I also think Wolchok is about to essentially endorse PS targeting. Going to be an exciting 2017 IMO. That would be correct : ) Wishing you all a very good year. James
JamesGMS Wednesday, 05/31/17 05:24:54 PM Re: north40000 post# 298228 Post # 298232 of 316268 Go North, re your question below: Quote: PPHM is in the middle of this...or is it the outskirts?: www.xconomy.com/national/2017/05/30/on-ascos-eve-experts-fret-over-backlash-to-cancer-combo-frenzy/?single_page=true# PPHM is right smack dab "in the middle of this" - and on multiple fronts. Enjoy your evening. James
JamesGMS Wednesday, 06/28/17 03:25:17 PM Re: golfho post# 300796 Post # 300799 of 316268 Go Golfho, re your response to Wook below: Quote: Quote:Ok..so all steps were executed exactly as outlined in the CC. So the larger exosome POC was executed and partnering discussions executed. Is this too far a statement Well I'm not comfortable saying "...all steps were executed exactly as outlined in the CC." I would say in process rather than executed exactly and again that is only my understanding of what was stated and what I believe is going on. "So the larger exosome POC was executed and partnering discussions executed." Again I would say in process rather than executed. In my view they stated their intentions to develop the POC and then seek a partner to monetize it. "Is this too far a statement " A tad... Regards golfho "In process" would be correct. I would only add that the process is nearing completion as you suggest. A bottle of wine is most certainly appropriate : ) Have a good day. James