InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 1158
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/21/2010

Re: JamesGMS post# 316404

Wednesday, 11/01/2017 2:05:24 PM

Wednesday, November 01, 2017 2:05:24 PM

Post# of 345969
James, care to comment on your insights and predictions which you have given in the past year ?

Lets see few here

JamesGMS Tuesday, 08/23/16 07:52:24 PM
Re: stoneroad post# 270746
Post #
270749
of 316268 Go
Stone, re your post below:

Quote:
Hutchins won't move the needle. Wolchok will.


Wolchok most certainly will move the needle - you can take that to the bank : )

James




JamesGMS Tuesday, 09/06/16 02:48:00 PM
Re: stoneroad post# 271625
Post #
271627
of 316268 Go
Stone, re your post below:

Quote:
Perhaps next we get trials funded by AZN.


From what we're hearing today's announcement represents just the tip of the iceberg - there is much more to come - which should shortly put all the RS discussion to rest for good.

Enjoy the week.

James




JamesGMS Monday, 09/26/16 01:51:19 PM
Re: CloakedProtector post# 273372
Post #
273413
of 316268 Go
CP, good information today. Re your post below:

Quote:
JJ, Dr. Garnick was on the last PPHM Quarterly and CC.

Dr. Garnick (and Dr. Brekken) are amongst those Scientists that invest in PPHM. Dr. Garnick will not be gone soon, he said he is not in this for the money and I believe him.

The Dr. Garnick gone and alike statements surface each time PPHM makes progression and something is upcoming. It becomes predictable.


Just wanted to confirm your statement highlighted above in red - as Rob already has a net worth in excess of that of PPHM {at the moment anyway and only for a short while longer} so he's most definitely not "in this for the money" - for him, now, and for that matter all the way back before his very first approval, it's always been about the science and making people's lives just a little better - or perhaps now, orders of magnitude better.

Here we go : )

James




JamesGMS Wednesday, 09/28/16 06:13:32 PM
Re: 4OurRetirement post# 273746
Post #
273748
of 316268 Go
4Our, re your post below:

Quote:
So, IF ESMO Presentation Confirms Phase2 Results Validity...

Then, very simply PPHM could see $5/share without any other news... but personally, I think more news is coming!


From what we continue to hear - the "if" has been removed from the equation.

Re your $5.00/share forecast - that wouldn't be unreasonable at first - but you are correct - it appears much much more is coming.

Here we go : )

James




JamesGMS Sunday, 03/19/17 07:44:59 PM
Re: stoneroad post# 291758
Post #
291772
of 316268 Go
Stone, re your post below:

Quote:
I think we are close to both a Bavi and exosomes partnership. I also think Wolchok is about to essentially endorse PS targeting. Going to be an exciting 2017 IMO.



That would be correct : )

Wishing you all a very good year.

James




JamesGMS Wednesday, 05/31/17 05:24:54 PM
Re: north40000 post# 298228
Post #
298232
of 316268 Go
North, re your question below:

Quote:
PPHM is in the middle of this...or is it the outskirts?:

www.xconomy.com/national/2017/05/30/on-ascos-eve-experts-fret-over-backlash-to-cancer-combo-frenzy/?single_page=true#


PPHM is right smack dab "in the middle of this" - and on multiple fronts.

Enjoy your evening.

James




JamesGMS Wednesday, 06/28/17 03:25:17 PM
Re: golfho post# 300796
Post #
300799
of 316268 Go
Golfho, re your response to Wook below:

Quote:
Quote:Ok..so all steps were executed exactly as outlined in the CC.

So the larger exosome POC was executed and partnering discussions executed.


Is this too far a statement


Well I'm not comfortable saying "...all steps were executed exactly as outlined in the CC." I would say in process rather than executed exactly and again that is only my understanding of what was stated and what I believe is going on.

"So the larger exosome POC was executed and partnering discussions executed." Again I would say in process rather than executed. In my view they stated their intentions to develop the POC and then seek a partner to monetize it.

"Is this too far a statement " A tad...

Regards
golfho


"In process" would be correct.

I would only add that the process is nearing completion as you suggest. A bottle of wine is most certainly appropriate : )

Have a good day.

James


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CDMO News