Parallel litigation Parallel litigation is a scenario in which different courts are hearing the same claim(s). The general rule is that parallel litigation (and the "race to judgment" that results) is a necessary and acceptable consequence of our system of dual sovereignty, in which both state and federal courts have personal jurisdiction over the parties. A major exception to this rule is that a second parallel In rem proceeding will be enjoined by the first court to obtain jurisdiction, as it has already been drawn into constructive possession of the object of the dispute.
Where it talks about parallel litigation... did Kay not post on the other board that they did well but not to forget they were being sued as well? Wouldn’t this be the parallel litigation? I get trying to get excited about possibilities but how do you not even mark that up on that picture? I don’t get the defense of “Kay said” and then when Kay says, nobody listens anyways