InvestorsHub Logo

PatentGuy1

10/30/17 5:30 PM

#133278 RE: KanadienEh #133275

We have a chicken and egg dilemma with regard to LQMT receiving royalties from licensing its technology.

On the one hand, licensing the technology allows it to spread rapidly without LQMT incurring the costs of establishing manufacturing facilities. Sound good for us.

On the other hand, how do you convince a company to be the first one to take a license, buy the equipment (either from Engel or Eontec), establish manufacturing facilities, etc., on a technology that is as of yet unproven?

IMO, we need to start off as a manufacturer of specialized parts (e.g., automotive or medical), prove that the process is commercially viable, and then start licensing the technology. I don't think we can license, until after it is proven to be commercially viable, which will require some commercial manufacturing - not just turning out prototypes.

Eagle1947

10/30/17 6:56 PM

#133280 RE: KanadienEh #133275

Now, having said all that wouldn't it be nice if the company confirmed your view (which sounds petty good to a novice such as me). Or, any view for that matter.

We are sitting once again full of speculative HOPE rather than concrete revenue.

Yes, I'm getting antsy and with good reason I'd say.