InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

diannedawn

10/28/17 2:29 PM

#42152 RE: Johnny_C #42151

Everyone who stated TAUG didn’t have damages will be eating crow.

except there is NO ONE that ever said TAUG "didn't have damages"...
People just disagreed on the AMOUNT of those damages.

Too funny

icon url

diannedawn

10/28/17 2:42 PM

#42153 RE: Johnny_C #42151

How do you figure ROI did not file the correct response?
They did not file ANY response to Shaw's improperly filed (corrected by the court) response to their Motion to Dismiss...
"07/14/2017 RESPONSE MEMORANDUM to re 7 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Petitioner Seth Shaw. Replies due by 7/21/2017. (Garfinkel, Louis) Modified event on 7/14/2017 (TR).
07/14/2017 NOTICE of Docket Correction to 9 Memorandum : Wrong event selected by attorney, court modified event to RESPONSE. (no image attached)(TR) "

Perhaps they did not feel a response was necessary...

That could have been a poor choice on their part...

Oh well...
He still did not "win" until the docket says judgement for the plaintiff
Or case close because __________.

ROTFLMAO