Replies to post #42070 on Tauriga Sciences Inc (fka TAUG)

[diannedawn]

Perhaps you can explain why these court occurrences were worthy of PRESS RELEASES. but the change in the trial DATE is NOT???
"Tauriga Sciences, Inc. Confirms September 22, 2017 Court Order Denying both Motions Filed by Defendants; (1) Extend the Trial Date and (2) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment"

"Tauriga Sciences, Inc. Confirms the Timely Submission of its Expert Report to Federal District Court New Jersey; Report Opines that Tauriga Suffered Losses of $3,995,000 USD at Minimum"

AND MY FAVORITE!!!!
"Tauriga Sciences, Inc. Notified by Federal District Court New Jersey of April 17, 2017 Trial Status Conference"
"Tauriga Sciences, Inc. , a company engaged in building businesses in the life sciences space, has today provided its shareholders with an update on the status of its ongoing federal lawsuit against its ..."

YA...SURE....A TRIAL STATUS CONFERENCE IS IMPORTANT "NEWS", RIGHT???
SHAREHOLDERS DESERVE AN "UPDATE"...
BUT THE DELAY OF THE TRIAL ITSELF FOR 3 MONTHS????
*CRICKETS*

SETH SHAW IS THE BIGGEST JOKE EVER...
This is just like his claim of posting here to "correct misinformation"...
YET HE WOULD NEVER CORRECT MISINFORMATION EITHER AT TAUG OR BVAP
THAT MIGHT BE VIEWED AS A POSITIVE THING!!!

solidus370  
Thursday, 04/23/15 09:19:38 AM
Re: adtime post# 3117

Post # of 10013 

I work 16 hour days. Spending 10-15 min responding on IHUB, does not constitute all day. I was a Math major at Cornell.

Let's see

16 hours equals 960 minutes

15 minutes (maximum time I spend interacting with IHUB posts)

DIVIDED BY

960 minutes

______________________________________________________________

1. 6% of my day would be characterized as time spent on IHUB . . . I do have 1.6% of my day to spend ensuring that misinformation is not spread about the company

Regards
Seth

BULLSHIT!

[loanranger]

Tauriga Sciences, Inc. Fully Retires Original $96,000 USD 12.00% Convertible Debenture Issued to Group 10 Holdings LLC on July 14, 2015

Sounds like "Mission Accomplished!" to me. I call that taking credit.

Stating a fact might be more like "Group 10 Debenture fully converted" or even more factually "Group 10 $96,000 Debenture for which the company received actual proceeds of $80,000 and issued 15,000,000 commitment shares of common stock has been fully converted by the lender".
That's the note that PURPORTEDLY carried a $1,000/day penalty that the company is trying to claim in the court case, isn't it? I say purportedly because I'm pretty sure that the terms of the note that imposed that penalty weren't filed until long after the penalty was asserted to be due....I'm not sure that the full note was EVER filed. It seems to have been asserted in some wacky filing with the NJ Board of Accountancy before the term was made public via an SEC filing, wasn't it?

Maybe I don't have that right either. Seems I can't find BOTH the NJ Board of Accountancy complaint that used to sit prominently on the Tauriga website (don't know why that would have disappeared) OR the original filing of the note with the SEC that reflected the default term asserted in the claim to the Court.
Think you could link me to either of those?

Maybe these will help (although they didn't help me any):
http://tauriga.com/
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=tauriga&owner=exclude&action=getcompany