Replies to post #42420 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nomorerollbacks]

NYT HAS FINALLY SEEN THE LIGHT OF DAY

"GOOD ARTISTS COPY, GREAT ARTISTS STEAL. WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN SHAMELESS ABOUT STEALING GREAT IDEAS" STEVE JOBS:

Obviously, like the above patent, they are not the same patents as vplm's.

So does this then mean that many of them are invalid patents?

I'm not talking about the ones that are totally unrelated to vplm's patents, but obviously, all these many companies must have patented processes to operate the basic tenets of voip.

So either they are valid patented processes, which would mean they are legit, not infringing, or, they are somehow the same as vplm's.

If so, how did they get it?

What about all the vsp's that were operating before the vplm patents were awarded.

This whole thing stinks.

ANOTHER REALLY BIG ...YUP...

WELL PUT NYT!!!!!