InvestorsHub Logo

Hurricane_Rick

10/19/17 3:21 AM

#78794 RE: superdow #78793

If you feel the BOD does not deserve compensation for its effort in salvaging yours, theirs and everybody's investment in MDMN from extinction, then I have nothing further to debate with you on that topic.

And MDMN does NOT have a joint venture with Auryn. MDMN is merely a shareholder. By your logic, that means that MDMN would also have a joint venture with AMNP and CDCH because they are a shareholder for those companies. And by analogy, it also means that YOU would have a joint venture with MDMN because you are a shareholder in MDMN.

Surwin

10/19/17 9:21 AM

#78798 RE: superdow #78793

I agree!

Veblen

10/19/17 7:08 PM

#78804 RE: superdow #78793

"It’s not a joint venture. MDMN merely owns shares in Auryn."

You are Wrong, HR is correct. Any attorney on this board can point out the world of difference between the two.