InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

RDY2ROCK

10/18/17 5:41 PM

#186476 RE: ZPaul #186474

AWESOME MUSIC to our ears - CHA-CHING CHING CHING CHING! $$$$$$$

$SFOR STRONG!!!!
icon url

ZPaul

10/18/17 5:42 PM

#186477 RE: ZPaul #186474

icon url

Jtech

10/18/17 5:43 PM

#186478 RE: ZPaul #186474

R&G presenting the IPR decision to the judge!!
icon url

learningtoinvest

10/18/17 5:47 PM

#186480 RE: ZPaul #186474

I find this kind of funny.

Quote:


"The Board’s decision not to institute the IPRs will not impact the above-captioned proceedings."
icon url

TechFocus

10/18/17 6:18 PM

#186489 RE: ZPaul #186474

ZPaul could you spell it exactly what this means? Will R&G now go after Vasco and Gemalto for more patent infringement?
icon url

SmallBuy

10/18/17 6:23 PM

#186491 RE: ZPaul #186474

essentially its saying a ruling that can be used as precedence from another juridiction and is substantial has occured so recently that another attempt at such is futile unless an appeal to a higher court happens.

this is a big proceeding.

dont allow more of these. but continue as scheduled.

Granted its the PATENT board and not a court.

but you cannot stay or recess or hold or lengthen for this now.