I read all of yesterday's posts this morning, and have some comments regarding several of them. I decided to just go back to the first one in this line of commentary.
First, I don't think very many investors are concerned about the share structure. If investors want fewer outstanding shares, then the reverse split that we all think was a mistake, would have resulted in some price growth. I also think that investors would see the good side of insiders holding a lot of shares, that being that they are incentivized to improve share value.
I think a sale of the company would result in a significant disappointment for most long term shareholders, because the price would be significantly lower than people here seem to expect. No way anyone is going to buy this company at more than $1.00 per share.
I like the dividend idea, but, unfortunately, we will need a couple more years of profit before it would be possible. There are no retained earnings with which to pay a dividend. Of course, you could use current year profits to pay a dividend, and ignore the accumulated deficit. But I think it is more important to reinvest that money into the current growth of the company's operations.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
