Replies to post #121437 on Sino Agro Food Inc (fka SIAF)

[RealDutch]

I believe when the true farming capabilities will eventually be revealed it will a sad day to many.

It won't matter. Most people have already made up their mind and nothing will change that.

The answer is, do more research. Like I did, for years. Validating the numbers from every possible angle. But even this shouldn't matter to anyone, what I think.

What should matter, is that TRW paid $30M for a master license in China. Unless you think that 50+ partners know it isn't true and SIAF commited fraud as a result. Not very likely. So you see, you don't have to be smart. All you have to do is focus (on what matters). And apply logic.

[ks1977]

Mark; Then you should focus on dismantling the facts, and not shout wolf-wolf for every single sheep you see (or think you see).

Using charged words about the "empty front" of SIAF, when people on this board has been there and seen that there is in deep a viable business, does not give credibility to your claim - hence, if you were to be correct, then you'll still fail in warning the shareholders...

And, again, the 36.6% in TRW is NOT the same as the old TRW. Hence "fiddling the companies around" is yet another inaccurate claim you make. SIAF has then managed to fraud other companies/partners, not just it shareholders. Also, frauds doesn't normally claim that they are struggling with operations, do they?

Time to move on from claiming SIAF is a fraud to warning about the REAL issues in SIAF?

[gnufrag]

I fear you could be right!