Mark; Then you should focus on dismantling the facts, and not shout wolf-wolf for every single sheep you see (or think you see).
Using charged words about the "empty front" of SIAF, when people on this board has been there and seen that there is in deep a viable business, does not give credibility to your claim - hence, if you were to be correct, then you'll still fail in warning the shareholders...
And, again, the 36.6% in TRW is NOT the same as the old TRW. Hence "fiddling the companies around" is yet another inaccurate claim you make. SIAF has then managed to fraud other companies/partners, not just it shareholders. Also, frauds doesn't normally claim that they are struggling with operations, do they?
Time to move on from claiming SIAF is a fraud to warning about the REAL issues in SIAF?
