My memory is accurate. You invested in the property and it is very easy to find our discussions about me telling you invest in management not in an asset.
Tell me I was wrong.
Now you make some claims that are true but you neglect to see the same issues as before. Scott had far more shares than Dan. But you don't consider that "legitimate". Fact is you are only a shareholder till you sell.
You claim Dan and Otto own some shares.... prove it.
I assume they do. But then you are also unable to explain where the market makers "find" 10m shares a month to sell at sub penny.
And since insiders keep secrets we don't know whow owns what Dan had 20m (?) In a fund that was seized did he have more than that?
You don't know. Or at least can't prove it and if you do know you are being given insider info. Which is not what a "legitimate shareholding" officer does.
Invest in management.
There is nothing to base an investment on when the management is hiding the facts from the shareholders.
And just FYI you should stop saying you were wrong about Keevil. You were not wrong about Scott, you just refused to look.
All this info you are telling me I am ignoring was all available years ago. Just because you recently decided to look at it doesn't mean I am ignoring it.
You would have been spot on about Keevil if you had chosen to look then instead of now.
I am really just telling you the same thing about Potts.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
