InvestorsHub Logo

rige

10/14/17 4:17 AM

#131530 RE: PatentGuy1 #131449

Quote: I still don't see any restrictions imposed on Eontec IP/BMG etc.

Seeing as how your sentence is ambiguous, I am forced to use more words. If you mean that Eontec is restricted in using Eontec IP, then I agree. Eontec is NOT restricted in using Eontec IP. However, if you mean that LQMT is restricted in using Eontec IP, then I disagree. The cross licensing agreement excluded CE, which means that LQMT cannot use Eontec IP in the field of CE.

Quote: How can you conclude Eontec is restricted from Using its own BMG/IP in CE ??

How can you misconstrue my conclusion so badly? I concluded that "LQMT cannot use Eontec's IP in the field of consumer electronic devices." I did not discus any restrictions on Eontec's usage of Eontec's IP. That is a straw argument that you are presenting to deflect from your failure to rebut my conclusion.



Repeat this, Li is LQMT, LQMT is Li.
Therefore Li/LQMT can use Li's/Eontec's IP in CE.

Your claims in red are wrong.