Replies to post #131398 on Liquidmetal Technologies Inc (LQMT)

[PatentGuy1]

Adding Words/quotes to make your case just shows you have no case.

When I was in college and post-grad school, it was drilled into me that you needed to provide citations. As my advisor used to say, "a fact that is unsupported by a citation merely becomes an opinion without a citation." I use quotations for two reasons:
1) to show that what I am saying isn't my interpretation of what the citation says, rather it is a direct quote; and
2) so that readers don't have to follow the citations for themselves and verify the veracity of my claim on what the citation says.

I'm sure the wise women and men on the U.S. Supreme Court will be surprised to learn that their usage of citations and quotations in their judicial decisions shows that they don't know what they are talking about.

And anyways, i thought you finally agreed that Eontec has no restrictions on its IP/BMG ??

Please show me any post where I asserted that the Eontec-LQMT cross licensing agreement restricted Eontec's usage of Eontec IP. Go back and see where this current thread began. It began with an hiksan's belief that "LQMT could sell to CE markets using the Eontec LM formulation" (see post 131250, http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=135339078) and I asked him what his belief was based on. You are the one how keeps bringing up Eontec and their usage of Eontec's IP.

[PatentGuy1]

Adding Words/quotes to make your case just shows you have no case.

By your own logic, then I guess you don't always have a case. For most recent examples, see posts 131413, http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=135370367, and 131425, http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=135375333, where you used quotations. Interestingly enough, both of those posts came after your criticism of quotations. LOL.