Agree, he's just another opinionated punter, with no special insights or information.
If the tweet had been a post on this board, it would not have raised any eyebrows.
AF is different however.
Take the recent tweet about an NWBO financing deal being imminent, including the bit about NWBO seeking more than they could successfully arrange.
Well that was material information that must have been fed to him.
I suggest that those who fed the information must have been very close to the financers or finance arrangers. Seeing as it was another toxic, dilutive financing, it was fairly obvious that the market would react negatively when the financing became officially announced. Those individuals could have shorted the stock, but would have laid themselves open to charges of insider trading. And insider trading, unlike naked shorting is occasionally policed. So instead, they fed the information to AF who publically tweeted it, thus allowing them to then short trade, as the info would be deemed to have entered the public domain.
All my just my opinion of course...
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
