News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Fletch-42

10/06/17 5:27 PM

#490905 RE: CBA09 #490902

Good info, keep it coming.
icon url

clawmann

10/06/17 5:31 PM

#490907 RE: CBA09 #490902

Thanks CBA09,

Your second item addresses the issues I was thinking about when I posted the question.

We are then left with a major issue. Assume that assets come back, this year, next year, or further in the future: which entity would be entitled to recover those assets? WMILT or WMIH. It has been and continues to be my position that WMILT is the legal successor to WMI with respect to anything not specifically assigned or transferred to WMIH by the POR.

icon url

johnydollar

10/06/17 5:40 PM

#490910 RE: CBA09 #490902

As per with K-MART BK the Debtors did not disclose the safe harbour assets,which at the end shareholders got zero.

At the end the assets gave the new K-MART a big boost and rocketing the price per share close to 500% within a year or two.

So my question is could WMIH end up with this assets just like K-MART and screw escrows?
icon url

DocKB

10/07/17 8:37 AM

#490966 RE: CBA09 #490902

Thanks CBA09.
A valuable post to help understand the process. I think that you are suggesting that the unfolding of some SPE's is possibly already in process. But I gather that the process can take months vs days or weeks.
icon url

xoom

07/16/18 8:45 AM

#526842 RE: CBA09 #490902

This from CBA09 was a classic.