InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

shalley

10/05/17 12:40 PM

#183206 RE: trades4ever74 #183205

Don't agree with you.According to you, the stock of a company who does not have any loans, does not owe anything to attorney firms, and has great potential worth 0.0001? "no bid with an ask of .0001 eventually"?

What a post.
icon url

mrdrifter

10/05/17 12:42 PM

#183207 RE: trades4ever74 #183205

I’ll take the over 15m :)
icon url

Baffic

10/05/17 12:53 PM

#183211 RE: trades4ever74 #183205

I think this is incorrect. "Half goes to lawyers the other half goes to the lenders".

https://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=75620136
The Funders shall receive from the proceeds of any litigation arising from the Litigation Enforcement of Patents (the “Claim Proceeds”), an amount equal to One Million, Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000) plus ten percent (10%) of any balance thereof until the Funders have received an aggregate of Seven Million, Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($7,500,000) and thereafter, in perpetuity, Two and One Half percent (2.5%) of any and all additional Claim Proceeds.


$15 Million. For argument sake 50% to lawyers.
$7.5 Million - $1.5 Million = $5 Million
$5 Million * .1 = $500,000 for Lender
$4.5 Million for SFOR

For a complete payout of the 7.5 (plus a bit more):

$150 Million For argument sake 50% to lawyers.
$75 Million - $1.5 Million = $73 Million
$73 Million * .1 = $7.3 Million for Lender (actually 6 Million to finish the 7.5 loan. leaving $67,000,000
$67,000,000 * .025 = $1,675,000 for Lender
$65,325,000 for SFOR and future settlements would only be the 2.5%.