InvestorsHub Logo

biosectinvestor

09/28/17 12:47 PM

#136868 RE: beachhyena #136866

Well said!

exwannabe

09/28/17 12:58 PM

#136870 RE: beachhyena #136866

Agree, healthcare in this the supposedly greatest country in the world is abysmal. It appears BP and Insurance cares only about profit at the expense of human life. DCVAX does not only lower the cost but more importantly has no side effects which to me is the biggest winner in all of this. If this treatment even matches SOC then it should replace it just for this benefit alone.


DCVax-L is being used in addition to SOC.

Thus the cost is ADDTIONAL to SOC costs, and they will noit be cheapo.

The side effects are also ADDITIONAL to SOC.

If DCVax+SOC matched SOC then you are paying more for nothing, and have more side effects.

GoodGuyBill

09/28/17 1:32 PM

#136873 RE: beachhyena #136866

Excellent point. I really never thought about DCVAX being approved for merely matches SOC. Given it saftey, lack of side effects, I agree. From a trial perspective, it is possible for DCVAX be approved for just meeting SOC?

DCVAX does not only lower the cost but more importantly has no side effects which to me is the biggest winner in all of this. If this treatment even matches SOC then it should replace it just for this benefit alone-- Beachhyena