Replies to post #129156 on Liquidmetal Technologies Inc (LQMT)

[tomtom7]

Can u copy and paste the text in the link? For some reason when I click that link only the left column shows and i am unable to see the diagrams and text.

[RG1970]

I posted this last week but some couldn't open it. Thank you for posting it.

[Ramp Worm]

Yes there seems to be more going on than meets the eye.

[PatentGuy1]

Thanks longinus, that is very interesting. What I find most interesting is that this pre-dates Li's LQMT involvement by several years. The application was originally filed in China on November 30, 2014, and was previously published on June 29, 2016.

https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=CN175159705&recNum=1&tab=Drawings&maxRec=&office=&prevFilter=&sortOption=&queryString=

[u3ratsinabag]

This is too strange for me...and I definitely do not believe that this constitutes "Evidence of direct Eontec-Apple manufacturing relationship."

In the BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS section of the application publication, FIG's 2&3 are described as a "Zirconium-based amorphous alloy part in Example 1" and a"Zirconium-based amorphous alloy part in Example 2", respectively.

They could have used an image of any simple rigid part, but they chose to publish an Apple logo? Why publish this, and not just PR the relationship if there is one?

This is direct evidence that someone furnished a part that bears the Apple logo, which I could do with my 3D printer, but this is not evidence of a relationship......and I don't think it should be stickied either.

Can we stop talking about Apple now....just for a while?

AND, don't get all "he's a psycho trader short imbecile" on me, because I am a true LONG - GLTA