I agree Talon and understand the "deck is stacked" against Anavex and the very limited resources they have compared much larger Biotech Companies.
I could write an essay on Fire Management in the US and the critical mistake of such aggressive fire suppression the past 50 years. Fires are getting bigger (and more dangerous) every-year, yet we spend more money now than we ever have suppressing them.....we have mistakenly turned our forests into unmanaged tinder-boxes in most cases across the west. The urban build-out the past 30 years has only complicated things from a suppression stand-point. We are back-peddling now with the push for more prescribed burns and fuels management projects but the amount of land to manage is overwhelming. I could go on. I will say fire suppression costs nation-wide have sky-rocketed (10s of Billions), and no matter how much money we spend fighting them, its usually the weather that ultimately puts them out. I cant PM but would be more than willing to share my insights through email. I have been on the front-lines of this fire-fight for over 24 years and have watched the progression. If you want a "grunts" perspective I can give it. If you want the political answer, that I cannot!
-Fireman