InvestorsHub Logo

Johnnyiwantsome

08/17/17 9:19 PM

#484974 RE: Johnnyiwantsome #484970

So BkShadow certain amounts ?

mattchew

08/17/17 11:24 PM

#484983 RE: Johnnyiwantsome #484970

Very Interesting post my friend! Could you please provide a link for that? I would very much like to read it!

mattchew

08/17/17 11:44 PM

#484984 RE: Johnnyiwantsome #484970

have brought constructive and actual intent fraudulent conveyance and preference
claims against the FDIC to recover certain amounts transferred to WMB before
its failure.
See Complaint, ¶¶ 25-44, Washington Mutual, Inc, v. FDIC, Case No.
1:09-cv-00533(RMC)(March 20,2009).

mattchew

08/17/17 11:48 PM

#484985 RE: Johnnyiwantsome #484970

The FDIC has not raised Section 730 as a defense, presumably because WMB was never issued a directive to raise capital!


AICPA Bylaw Section 730 

7.3 Disciplinary Action Without a Hearing
As amended
January 12, 1988,
unless otherwise indicated
    .01    Membership in the Institute shall be suspended or terminated without a hearing for disciplinary purposes, or a member may be subjected to other disciplinary actions, as provided in sections 7.3.1 and 7.3.2, under such conditions and by such procedure as shall be prescribed by the Council.
[As revised October 18, 2003.]
(See section 730R.)
            7.3.1  Criminal Conviction of Member
            Membership in the Institute shall be suspended without a hearing should there be filed with the secretary of the Institute a judgment of conviction imposed upon any member for
        7.3.1.1  A crime punishable by imprisonment for more than one year;
        7.3.1.2  The willful failure to file any income tax return which the member, as an individual taxpayer, is required by law to file;
        7.3.1.3  The filing of a false or fraudulent income tax return on the member's or a client's behalf; or
        7.3.1.4  The willful aiding in the preparation and presentation of a false and fraudulent income tax return of a client; and
shall be terminated in like manner upon the similar filing of a final judgment of conviction; however, the Council shall provide for the consideration and disposition by the trial board, with or without hearing, of a timely written petition of any member that the member's membership should not be suspended or terminated pursuant to section 7.3.1.1, herein.
            7.3.2  Other Disciplinary Action

                  7.3.2.1  Membership in the Institute shall be suspended without a hearing should a member's certificate as a certified public accountant or license or permit to practice as such or to practice public accounting be suspended as a disciplinary measure; however, such suspension of membership shall terminate upon reinstatement of the certificate, license or permit. Membership in the Institute shall be terminated without a hearing should such certificate, license, or permit be revoked, withdrawn, surrendered, indefinitely suspended, or cancelled as a disciplinary measure or in connection therewith.
        [As revised October 18, 2003.]

        7.3.2.2  The professional ethics executive committee and the Board of Directors may jointly approve certain governmental agencies and other organizations whose disciplinary actions against a member will permit the Institute to take disciplinary action against that member without a hearing. To be eligible for approval, the governmental agency must be one which has the authority to prohibit a member from either practicing before it or serving as a director, officer or trustee of an entity. To be eligible for approval, an organization other than a governmental agency must be one which has been granted the authority by statute or regulation to regulate accountants. If such approved governmental agency or organization temporarily suspends, prohibits or restricts a member from practicing before it or another governmental agency, or from serving as a director, officer or trustee of any entity, the member’s membership in the Institute shall be suspended; however, such suspension of membership shall terminate upon such agency’s or organization’s termination of the suspension, prohibition or restriction. If such approved governmental agency or organization bars or permanently or indefinitely suspends, prohibits or restricts a member from practicing before it or another governmental agency, or from serving as a director, officer or trustee of any entity, the member’s membership in the Institute shall be terminated.
[As adopted October 18, 2003.]
        7.3.2.3 A member who has been subjected to any sanction as a disciplinary measure other than or in addition to those sanctions addressed above, by an authority covered in section 7.3.2.1 or section 7.3.2.2, may also be subjected to discipline by the Institute without a hearing pursuant to guidelines established by the professional ethics executive committee and approved by the Board of Directors.
[As adopted October 18, 2003.]
        7.3.2.4 Council shall permit the trial board, with or without a hearing, to consider a timely written petition by the professional ethics executive committee or the member that the member should not be disciplined pursuant to this section 7.3.2.
[As revised October 18, 2003.]
            7.3.3 Trial Board Disciplining Not Precluded

mattchew

08/18/17 12:20 AM

#484987 RE: Johnnyiwantsome #484970

Bank (“WMB”), which was placed in FDIC receivership on September 25, 2008,have brought constructive and actual intent fraudulent conveyance and preference claims against the FDIC to recover certain amounts transferred to WMB before
its failure.
[color=red][/color]

General Information

On September 26, 2008, Washington Mutual, Inc. ("WMI") and WMI Investment Corp. ("WMIC" and together with WMI, the "Debtors") filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the "Court") (Case No. 08-12229 (MFW)).

On February 24, 2012 (the "Confirmation Date"), the Court entered an order confirming the Debtors' Modified Seventh Amended Joint Plan of Affiliated Debtors Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the United Stated Bankruptcy Code, dated December 12, 2011 as modified (the "Plan"). To view a copy of the Plan, together with the corresponding press release and Form 8-K that was filed by WMI with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on the Confirmation Date, please click here to access the Plan.

On March 19, 2012 (the "Effective Date"), the Plan became effective and certain of the Debtors' assets were transferred to a newly formed Delaware liquidating trust (the "WMI Liquidating Trust") as further described in the Plan. To view a copy of the Form 8-K that was filed by WMI (which changed its name to WMI Holdings Corp. on the Effective Date) with the SEC on the Effective Date, please click here.

Further information regarding the WMI Liquidating Trust and/or the Debtors is available by clicking on each of the links to the left. The link titled "Bankruptcy Court Documents" contains a link to the filings that the Debtors have made with the Court. The link titled "Beneficiary Tax Information" includes important tax information for beneficial holders regarding the WMI Liquidating Trust interests.

bkshadow

08/18/17 4:57 AM

#484990 RE: Johnnyiwantsome #484970

Sorry, that case is DWP, and never was $25B...

...as per the actual court documents.

...and the concluding documents, i.e., the GSA.


...and never even related to the OP regarding the $25B UPSTREAM FROM WMB to WMI.

...not even mentioned in the filings.

...WHY?

...never happended.

...and never even related to the reply OP regarding the $25B DOWNSTREAM FROM WMI to WMB.

...not even mentioned in the filings.

...WHY?

...never happened.

...neither of the $25B amounts, $50B in total, EVER referred to by any party in interest in almost 10 years.

..WHY.

...simple, simply didn't and doesn't exist.


...might want to take a look at the D&O and related arguments about the TINY transfer WMI "did make" prior to the seizure re: the actual, minimal transfer that did take place.

...regardless, all MOOT BTW.

...case closed DWP (dismissed with prejudice; done, over, nada, zip, zero).

...and not $25B one way plus $25B the other; $50B of 'just theories with no support at all.

...add such "to the list."

...trillions and trillions FOUND.

...$-0- ever materialized.

BBANBOB

08/20/17 9:32 AM

#485141 RE: Johnnyiwantsome #484970

Bank (“WMB”), which was placed in FDIC receivership on September 25, 2008,have brought constructive and actual intent fraudulent conveyance and preference
claims against the FDIC to recover certain amounts transferred to WMB before
its failure........


As I have suggested MANY TIMES, WAMU "LOANED WMB 20 BILLION DOLLARS"

And IMHO this is EXACTLY WHY we have standing in the case and have NOT RELEASED THE FDICK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


The combined companies put out a PR that stated 10 bill would be paid back within 3 weeks and that the balance and AND INTEREST would be paid back within the next 12 months!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

SO THERE ALONE IS 22 BILLION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

They should have as well filed CONVERSION OF ASSETS into the mix imho

I said both were at the time of the seizure, applicable