InvestorsHub Logo

Kizersosae

08/17/17 4:33 PM

#9760 RE: mkjoke #9759

Haha great minds think a like... this was my follow up email:

I read the 10k and from what I can tell like I stated earlier, it would assume it is all legally set up. But the question needs answered, why is it set up?

Why are the top two executives being paid for consultations on their own company? What services did their companies provide that they needed paid for?

I will let you know her response. But I still feel it's gonna be a vague response. Let's hypothetically say it's for tax reasons. Do we really think they will tell us that? So then I ask myself, and everyone else needs to do the same, is this a deal breaker? Not for me.

Fido

08/17/17 6:28 PM

#9761 RE: mkjoke #9759

If you pay a consultant they are responsible for the whole Social Security / Medicare cost. If you are drawing a salary the company has to pay half of that. Considering I run a software company, I would much rather pay for a consultant because it saves the company a bunch of money. Hey, maybe that's why I've never "hired" anyone as an employee, imagine that.

Now I don't propose to fully understand the rational for BiCorRx's current pay structure. And while it should indeed be questioned for clarification, I also understand that corporations (oh yeah, mine is a C corp) do things that may seem a bit odd in order to move forward.