InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

madprophet

08/17/17 3:04 PM

#26123 RE: AlphaInvestor8 #26121

Alpha, and as you can see...
They don't want to listen.
This is a spec stock.
This is no gimme,
this is risky trading.
This is gambling.
We are on the same page, and trust me I do appreciate your contributions.
One of the reasons I will sell a large chunk of shares as CAFC approaches. BEFORE JUDGES are announced. Is because of you and your info.

icon url

22na22

08/17/17 6:27 PM

#26148 RE: AlphaInvestor8 #26121

The issue I am trying to address is some here seem to be trying to suggest this is a 'no brainer'



I'll take a quote check on this one, please.

Also - there is not a chance in **** Susman and Godfrey seriously looked at the 50 claims and expected more than 15 to get through. You throw as many claims into a case like this because it literally cannot hurt you, the more the better. So the fact that 42 were killed is not as important than the fact that 8 are remaining, and they cover the technology that WDDD has always claimed infringement on.

Like I said before, 8/50 (16%) doesn't actually mean 16% in this case. It means helluva lot more than that.

Not going to speculate on revenue numbers, I have no idea.