InvestorsHub Logo

loanranger

08/16/17 3:26 PM

#40452 RE: plutoniumimplosion #40450

I don't know how I missed this but I did:
"And if the rumors are true and the whistle blower(s) are to come forward, because they have already been identified, and provide testimony that this entire episode was invented by TAUG's CEO and his paid consultant to goose the value of the stock in order to raise money, and is thus a fraud on the court, and a fraud on shareholders and the public, then it will be an eventful autumn. Yes, it did start out, in my opinion, to be a lawsuit about right and wrong, but it isn't any longer and hasn't been for a long time."

The existence of any whistle blowers was quickly denied...something we could have expected whether they exist or not. But you say that they have been identified.
Do you know who they are or are you relying on someone else's representation to you, a friend perhaps, that they have been identified?

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=132986481&txt2find=whistleblower

Johnny_C

08/16/17 7:34 PM

#40456 RE: plutoniumimplosion #40450

Let's see if they have been punished enough. Let's let the experts value damages.

I think the ex TAUG BOD Berman is selling you a load of bull. Lol

Let's see any proof that a lawsuit was concocted. How much of what stated has come true. Oops. Not much

clearmont88

08/16/17 7:44 PM

#40458 RE: plutoniumimplosion #40450

who exactly is informing you about this "so called whistle blower"

seifer1975

08/16/17 8:53 PM

#40460 RE: plutoniumimplosion #40450

How could anyone but the auditors be responsible for the lawsuit. They are the ones that committed the malpractice. Let's see some evidence to support your allegation.