Replies to post #26004 on Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[22na22]

The fact I have corrected MANY here proves that out.

You have also been corrected by others but have continually refuse to admit it.

People want to argue that a 1 man company with no R&D spend, no revenues, and only patents as its only asset is not an NPE - read the friggen definition of a NPE - anyone arguing that point is basically telling anyone with a brain the word 'english' is not spelled 'english'.

1) You continually ignore the repeated explanations of WDDD's softwares and attempted development to become a leader in using its patents back in the early 2000s.

Just because the company was unsuccessful and cannot generate revenues and profits from its software does NOT mean any company can willfully infringe upon its IP in making a better product. WDDD had the technology first, and is properly documented and patented.

2) You also continually ignore that WDDD transferred its property and employees over to MRMD (previously known as Worlds Online Inc). So while technically WDDD has no employees besides Kidrin and technically only patents, that's not the entire story.

People argue against the fact that the company stated in its own 10Q it would undertake an offering to repay notes in default (if it logically cannot pay from proceeds from the suit - and since those proceeds wont be seen for years, clearly an offering is reality) - but somehow that is not a fact? No its a fact, and those people want to ignore that reality.

No one is arguing this - some are just saying that WDDD also owns almost $10M of MRMD stock it could simply liquidate for those notes if it wanted to.

Also, you continually ignore that this potential dilution is nothing but a maybe 1-cent reduction in PPS in the short-term. Great, perfect for averaging down.

People want to argue that 101 doesn't apply or they try to convolute the issue, to confuse others and misdirect, when ATVI ALREADY RAISED 101 IN COURT!! but no its not applicable? really? people here are smarter than AVTI lawyers?

You continually ignore our explanations that 101 is a real issue, but not as heavily weighted as the VirnetX case because of VirnetX's positive outcome as a non-combinatory technical patent (like WDDD's patents) while VRNG was a combinatory marketing patent.

People want to argue that the CAFC doesn't kill patents when facts show they have been very anti npe/patent holder since the AIA was put into place? really?

Sure - more than 50% of patent cases are losers. That's why this stock is $0.04. Who doesn't know this information?

As Patent Plays pointed out well though, the MA court has been on the friendlier side and technology patents have held up much better than others.

People here didn't understand/ wanted to argue that judges can't address issues sua sponte?

Sure, but all we can do is speculate on the facts as we know them. Trying to guess what issue will be decided is not in many people's best interests for cost/benefit/time.

People here wanted to argue that the patents can't be completeley killed? ie tied to the cross appeal issues?

Who has ever said that?

For the millionth time, this stock is $0.04. We all understand the patents can be killed at any level. But they haven't yet.

People want to argue that risks of this case are somehow mitigated by cases that have not been ajudicated and ruled on, and as such are not in the library of precdent?

Nope, we simply think a positive ruling of Wifi One could have a positive catalyst effect that could raise WDDD's PPS floor.

[buylosellhi]

Some of us fully comprehend the risk and bet accordingly. We don't care about all the details because anything can happen either way. I can appreciate your expertise in legal matters though, thank you for bringing your knowledge to the board Alpha. I personally look forward to your analysis of events as they unfold, even if they are contrarian to my holdings.

[Go_War_Eagle]

A lot of people have spent a TON of time/research and have made a lot of good points on the board the last few weeks (I even talked with a Patent Lawyer myself about this). Reading this board is even better than taking a research class on psychological persuasion.

Anyway, after reading every single post over the last few weeks and reading everyones' good points, I still get that the biggest risk of this stock is the assignment of judges at the CAFC (Anyone please correct me if I'm wrong). Whoever is right/wrong about it being an NPE, whether the odds of an NPE are easier to solidify etc... is entirely off-topic (basically most of the points, as good as they are, are off-topic as far as I can see).

The biggest and most important point I see is the assignment of the judges at CAFC. There are 18 judges and 3 will sit on the panel. There are 2 judges that usually rule against patents (and even though those 2 judges usually rule negatively doesn't necessarily mean that they even would rule negatively in this case). Anyone please correct me if I'm wrong with any of the logistics of the CAFC set-up.

Anyway, it seems the single biggest factor are the odds of having 2 judges out of 18 sitting on a panel of 3 which is roughly 4%. I like our 96% chance of having a panel of favorable judges, because our patents are sound.

I'm sticking with this stock and am not selling, and if it does dip down because of a dilution or for any other reason (such as people getting scared or misinterpreting Bungie's response), I have saved some extra dry powder and am going to buy more on the dip (of course it is disposable funds I would spend as there is still risk).