Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[AlphaInvestor8]

Sticking one's head in the sand when REAL FACTS about WDDD are shared but against your view or understanding, then insulting the messenger of those facts does not change those facts

What it does, is makes you unwilling to accept you didn't fully comprehend your investment in WDDD or its risk

The fact I have corrected MANY here proves that out.

The vitriol I have faced for those facts proves it out, so much so as people now argue that WDDD isn't a NPE! LOL

Really? That has no bearing on really anything (other than if the judges are anti NPE) and yet people want to attack me for that very obvious reality?

People want to argue that a 1 man company with no R&D spend, no revenues, and only patents as its only asset is not an NPE - read the friggen definition of a NPE - anyone arguing that point is basically telling anyone with a brain the word 'english' is not spelled 'english'.

People argue against the fact that the company stated in its own 10Q it would undertake an offering to repay notes in default (if it logically cannot pay from proceeds from the suit - and since those proceeds wont be seen for years, clearly an offering is reality) - but somehow that is not a fact? No its a fact, and those people want to ignore that reality.

People want to argue that 101 doesn't apply or they try to convolute the issue, to confuse others and misdirect, when ATVI ALREADY RAISED 101 IN COURT!! but no its not applicable? really? people here are smarter than AVTI lawyers?

People want to argue 101 doesn't apply because magically the judge (at district court) could have just snapped her fingers and ruled on it without reading briefs or writing an opinion prior to the PTAB stay? Really? that's how law works?

People want to argue that the CAFC doesn't kill patents when facts show they have been very anti npe/patent holder since the AIA was put into place? really?

People here didn't understand/wanted to argue that Bungie couldn't cross appeal? Like just bc WDDD filed first Bungie cant attack the entire ruling?

People here didn't understand/ wanted to argue that judges can't address issues sua sponte?

People here wanted to argue that the patents can't be completeley killed? ie tied to the cross appeal issues?

People want to argue that risks of this case are somehow mitigated by cases that have not been ajudicated and ruled on, and as such are not in the library of precdent? These same people seem to act like they KNOW the outcome is obviously positive for WDDD and patent holders when the CAFC and SCOTUS have been anything but patent friend since the AIA was put into law? That's a mitigant? A case that hasn't been ruled on and some guy on the internet/message boards says it will go our way mitigates risk? If so, jeez WDDD should put that in their risk factors no? No its a baseless opinion and hope.

That's only some of the "nonsense of mine" you suggest is 'obvious' sir.

What is obvious, is that there is a whole lot of emotional, irrational investors here who are tied to a stock and don't want to see the objective reality.

And that is fine, but don't try to argue all that above is false and not reality. You can choose to gamble but still consider the objective reality you are operating in. Many here seem offended that I raised VALID and FACTUAL reality. That is frightening.

http://www.businessinsider.com/cognitive-biases-that-affect-decisions-2015-8

Good read in that link