InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

billpr

08/15/17 2:41 PM

#41841 RE: Dibbs 1 #41840

If they haven't scratched their heads by now, they probably won't. IMO the only way "this thing", as Schneid put it, is going to move is a concerted effort of significant insider buying and a simultaneous buy-back of at least 100K shares at the minimum. BTW thanks for your comment on my "barking". I plead guilty.
icon url

fishhunter

08/15/17 3:44 PM

#41842 RE: Dibbs 1 #41840

Hi Dibbs, I asked the Dave&Busters question. In the past I have asked them about insider buying and I GUARANTEE they know exactly how all of us view the situation, especially with regard to how some on the BOD are barely even shareholders.

I do think that at least right now part of the "problem" (a good problem) is that there really is a ton of stuff going on with the company that outsiders like us are not privy to but that prevents insiders from buying. No one can quibble with Ferris' stake, it probably wouldn't even be good (from an institutional investor viewpoint) for us if he owned more. My biggest gripe was always with the BOD and other top execs not buying.

With the last 8 years and specifically the recent 2 quarters and outlook strongly implied in yesterday's PR, this is a STRONG BUY. EPS this year already at 12 cents and hitting 18 - 22cents for the year sure seems probable. Accounting for cash on the bal sheet and all else (including OTC status) they conservatively deserve a PE of 20. Then look at PS, seems likely 2017 revenue will be in the 18 - 20mil range. Stock price of $4 is a PS of about 3. Half that of Taser, more than some others, so maybe about right.

Yet here we sit at 2.16. If I were home I would buy some. Killing time at the library b4 a 4pm appt.