InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

PayMEmf

08/07/17 9:23 PM

#124388 RE: iQT #124387

Yes no accumulation here what so ever 117% ytd means f all!!
icon url

CIMA7

08/07/17 9:29 PM

#124390 RE: iQT #124387

In my opinion you're looking at things very wrong. A couple of years ago sure but not now my friend.
icon url

ngsww

08/07/17 9:55 PM

#124392 RE: iQT #124387

I suppose it depends how you define a "trading stock". If you are implying that anything that isn't an investment that you can you set and forget for 30 years, then I suppose at this moment you are correct.

If your definition is more loose than that I would beg to differ with you opinion. All one has to do is look at the chart since Li took over and you realize that we are mirroring the pattern of other very successful companies during their infancy. It is hard to say that this is only a "trading stock" to people that have made 50%, 100%, 200%, or even 400%+ on their money within the year, which is more than most mutual funds/hedge funds/other large-mid caps could provide.

I do agree with you that profitability is the keystone to unlock massive investment $$$$ pouring into this company and we will likely remain under $1 until that happens.
icon url

BBboy

08/08/17 12:10 AM

#124395 RE: iQT #124387

Only for IQT.

As for me and my house, been holding long and strong.

Been riding the tide up from 0.06, and do not plan on selling any time soon.


icon url

rige

08/08/17 4:32 AM

#124401 RE: iQT #124387

$LQMT is a trading stock until it can turn profits.


Nonsense, there is no where near the volume needed to trade this stock, todays volume is less than the holdings of some posters on this board.