InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

OFP

08/03/17 12:34 PM

#113820 RE: falconer66a #113805

So I will sterilize this...

But Where's the Normal Decline Plot? Can you tell us just why you failed to include, at an accurate scale and proportion, a plot line of normal Alzheimer's cognition decline?


The comparison plot has been posted. Did you have a feel for the comparison before you claimed stabilization/improvement or do you want to revise that now?

If so, if it's so obvious that these are bogus data points of minimal cognition validity, why didn't any of the hundreds of PhDs and MDs who scrutinized this Anavex presentation raise the objections you have?

Some have. However, I suggest we stick with the primary data so the discussion stays evidence based instead of "eminence based".

If you would like to read more on the P300 I suggest with the paper AVXL used as their reference for historical control (Lahmy or something like that). Its pretty clear in just that one that the latency is a far better measure.

Therefore, the Imputation of Anavex Fraud Remains.

Just wanted to point out that to this point I have never claimed their skewed presentation of data rose to the level of fraud.
icon url

frrol

08/03/17 1:16 PM

#113832 RE: falconer66a #113805

Falconer do you understand that the thousands of biotechs, public and private, that bravely researched and failed were not frauds? 99.9% are perfectly legitimate; biotech is simply a risky venture and sound investing in it is done with eyes open, not eyes closed or with misconceptions or illusions. How long have you been investing?