The comparison plot has been posted. Did you have a feel for the comparison before you claimed stabilization/improvement or do you want to revise that now?
Some have. However, I suggest we stick with the primary data so the discussion stays evidence based instead of "eminence based".
If you would like to read more on the P300 I suggest with the paper AVXL used as their reference for historical control (Lahmy or something like that). Its pretty clear in just that one that the latency is a far better measure.
Just wanted to point out that to this point I have never claimed their skewed presentation of data rose to the level of fraud.
Falconer do you understand that the thousands of biotechs, public and private, that bravely researched and failed were not frauds? 99.9% are perfectly legitimate; biotech is simply a risky venture and sound investing in it is done with eyes open, not eyes closed or with misconceptions or illusions. How long have you been investing?