InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

MD-420

08/03/17 2:12 AM

#88201 RE: bigballer_sa4 #88190

Right, and that's why how I got thrown for a loop, and why I was originally saying the next quarter needed to be 3m at minimum. Thanks for helping me get my head screwed back on straight ardd I was thinking we already knew q4 and were now focused on q1.

I'd be surprised if they beat all last year in q1, but I understand they have set the expectation high, and they should be held to that. Am I remembering correctly that there will be one more one time net income occurrence realized for q1. If so, I'm pretty much backing that out and holding to the 3m minus any one time net income occurrence.