InvestorsHub Logo

Sjam410

08/02/17 2:46 PM

#29941 RE: lesgetrich #29940

Excellent explanation.

Breck22

08/02/17 2:51 PM

#29943 RE: lesgetrich #29940

Well put and much needed clarification Les! You should sticky that, its an excellent and valuable reminder.

For_Real_Dude

08/02/17 2:53 PM

#29945 RE: lesgetrich #29940

Great explanation! I know I didn't see any report of issuing new shares. I actually heard that PNTV is turning down investment offers.

DandiDon

08/02/17 3:51 PM

#29959 RE: lesgetrich #29940

Good one! You sound as if you have your Series 7; I have a Series 7 myself...

DandiDon

08/02/17 3:53 PM

#29961 RE: lesgetrich #29940

I'm glad someone on here knows what they're talking about!

Toxic Avenger

08/02/17 6:30 PM

#29975 RE: lesgetrich #29940

Check out the warrants RxMM already has, as well as the toxic loans on the books.

Plenty of dilution.

N_D_K_Hey

08/04/17 5:03 PM

#30349 RE: lesgetrich #29940

Very informative essay on dilution, Les.

In my mind any new shares, for example via scheduled warrants, which facilitated the award of marijuana licenses would be accretive and not dilutive, because of the ensuing revenues from the licenses and the value of the licenses themselves far outweighing the financing cost.

Sobeflyer

08/17/17 10:42 AM

#30939 RE: lesgetrich #29940

When I first bought shares in this company, there were 110M outstanding.

Now there are more than 550M outstanding.

Virtually no appreciable revenues in the intervening years.

Please explain how that is not dilution.