InvestorsHub Logo

Twister

07/27/17 6:36 PM

#41687 RE: fishhunter #41686

Read his $1.60/$1.65 as $2.60/2.65 in error!

And FYI... Your personal concerns are a waste of my time.

billpr

07/27/17 9:01 PM

#41693 RE: fishhunter #41686

Explain to me your last paragraph please.

billpr

07/28/17 11:19 AM

#41697 RE: fishhunter #41686

I still don't get it, you say if VTSI goes down to 1.60 or 1.65 or nothing, we would walk away with 3.00-4.00/share within a month. How do we do that?

frpt100k

07/28/17 11:32 AM

#41698 RE: fishhunter #41686

Let's hope VTSI does get to 1.6 or 1.5 or sub-$1. Why? Simple, because that would be the end of VTSI and we would all walk away with $3 or $4/share within a month.

I do not understand this comment and I don't see how it's accurate. I was involved in a position shortly after the Iraq war started and much like this stock, was buying at sub .10 to the tune of 100'sx 100's of shrs. The company had a r/s same as vtsi and from a pps at the time the .35 area to 3.50 area and proceeded to fall to a .69 low before it rose to a $35 high. I realize that although there is a need for vtsi's offerings, the actual need is not as critical. That is not to say that vtsi will not do well, I believe it will but I'm of the opinion that these random shootings will be no longer tolerated under this administration. No, I don't want to discuss politics--just my observations/opinions of today's current structure.. The way the lawsuits have been decided over the last several years have been very detrimental to the cities and especially smaller bergs of the nation. Even if there is real criminal intent and the shooting was a clean shoot incident, the legal costs are still huge and especially if the incident was wrongful. The need for proper training is the answer or at least a big part as I'm sure we holders can all agree. And I'd still like to see lower levels at this time for a short period.