InvestorsHub Logo

pumper_stumper

07/27/17 9:07 AM

#47500 RE: Nowak488 #47499

Absolutely no proof in that. Only claims by the 4 Stooges themselves, and quotes of their claims. Hardly an impartial judge.

At least one long time significant shareholder has stated here in their opinion, the Stooges work has been a "wash", meaning, net zero. Since then of course, they have had additional expenses.

Back to yesterday, have you found a single shareholder vote that worked on mailing date? If not, why would you even consider that mailing date would be the case here?

Take one step back. Are you even in agreement that mailing date is not valid here, as I and others have told you?

artang

07/27/17 9:36 AM

#47501 RE: Nowak488 #47499

They did reduce the payment to Platinum to $55 million which seems quite a bit from what it originally was. So that is a good thing, Platinum got less money than they originally were due. Also in the settlement some preferred stock that Platinum had was canceled, so they won't be getting paid that either.