Another variable in the whole value / RSI thought process is the applied multiple. Often the smaller speculative companies can have multiples in the 100's. We still see them in the Teslas on the NASDAQ. The average multiplier on NASDAQ is 25. Which I personally think is too much, should be x10.
Since AMFE is trading like a big boy stock already, on fundamentals (again...rare in pink stocks..) so the multiples we are using are VERY conservative. GRO3 and 2018 Guidance could change that, so you could possibly get a higher PPS than I mentioned and actually have it supported, e.g. if the market applied a x50 multiplier. Not unheard of at all. Look at Telsa, supported for years now way way beyond any fundamentals. As the pps goes up, the company matures and growth is stabilized and predictable, the multiple should settle down a little. I imagine that won't be for years though.
My earlier post is generally using a x10-x20 multiplier. I like to be very conservative with these things. This lends to RSI meaning even less to me. Just TA folk trading on low volume days might move the price and declare themselves uber trading masters with mad skillz.
As price and volume continues to increase, this will allow less and less shenanigans, and after uplisting MMs won't play as many reindeer games, they will just do their normal skim off the top vs blatant manipulation.
IMO
$$$$AMFE$$$$
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
