InvestorsHub Logo

Oren1976

07/23/17 5:47 PM

#1100 RE: wcopeland #1099

It looks like they considered 4 weeks as one month. I still consider what they did as kind of cheating unless somebody come with sufficient explanation

gr8db8

07/23/17 6:08 PM

#1102 RE: wcopeland #1099

I think you're right, wcopeland. I was using the fact that there are 52 weeks / year and that averages to 4.33 weeks / month. Also, the Hebrew / solar calendar alternates between 29 and 30 days per month.

Using 4 wks (28 days) / month is reasonable but opens up the data to accuracy questions. Perhaps that is why they changed the data from months to weeks; to be more accurate.

I'm not too concerned about it. 59 weeks is still a heck of an improvement from 32 weeks. Even if the interim data comes back with 55 weeks, that would be amazing. Anything above 50 weeks would be amazing, imo (especially considering how many others have failed).