Replies to post #39535 on Tauriga Sciences Inc (fka TAUG)

[Johnny_C]

"Had the negligence not occurred the conversions would not have occurred."

That can't be proven.

That is about as absurd as thinking lawsuit will not fly and Cowan is filing a RICO lawsuit.

"Even after the PCAOB and Cowan agreed to the censure, the PCAOB left plenty of time for TAUG to rectify the annual report had Cowan notified TAUG and cooperated with TAUG."
Plenty of time for what? That couldn't have happened without conducting a complete re-audit using a different lead auditor.

First, Taug should have been notified in November. But if Cowan was upfront with TAUG even at the point of agreeing to the censure another auditor could have been put on the case. Instead, Cowan violated more rules by certifying and taking money from TAUG that they could re audit 2014.

A Judge will recognize that and I would expect any settlement to reflect it.

This statement has been stated by you several times, yet nothing has come to pass. Instead the Court has accepted all of TAUG's claims as acceptable, including dilution.

Investors should be cautious of opinions that fly in the face of facts. For if one does not know where to find the Rules of Professional Conduct which is incorporated into the PCAOB rules I would not put any merit into opinions handicapping what a judge will do, Especially when the Court accepted all of TAUG's claims for trial after listening to Blow Hard attorney Ronald Herzog's arguments.

GAME SET MATCH - SETH SHAW

[ricanich]

"Even after the PCAOB and Cowan agreed to the censure, the PCAOB left plenty of time for TAUG to rectify the annual report had Cowan notified TAUG and cooperated with TAUG."
Plenty of time for what? That couldn't have happened without conducting a complete re-audit using a different lead auditor. When did TAUG or Cowan put that option on the table?
Cowan couldn't just have had a different lead auditor sign off after the audit was completed...audits don't work that way. Do you really think that the PCAOB would have found that acceptable? Of course not.

Revisionist history, seems to me you previously stated that all Cowan had to do was switch auditors. That is until Johhny C posted the rules. It would have been a clear conflict of interest.