Replies to post #56944 on Tonner One World Holdings Inc (TONR)

[mvp_stocks]

I'll destroy this post too later on

[mvp_stocks]

You keep posting variations of the same stuff which my previous post pretty much covers in detail. Obviously I sticky posted it so people can cross check everything you say.

you realize that at the time of that year old conference call, filings were current, Stacey McBride-Irby was the designer, OWOO had a CFO,

Steve Jobs, founder/inventor of Apple was also voted out of Apple, as well as countless other world renowned CEO's who have resigned, or been forced out, yet the companies continued to do business. Some thrived, some didn't. It is what it is. But, by your logic, in the case of TONR and Stacey McBride-Irby's resignation it's the end of the company as we know it? Be serious, please.

As for filings being current the company will be Active in NV soon enough.

In business nothing ever goes according to plan, especially for start ups but TONR kicked as* removing the convertible debt and is now self-funding TONR according to today's PR.

and Tonner was still around. He's not anymore.

Yes he is, as I proved in my previous post and as will be proven by Tonner himself imo, soon enough.

In fact, the Tween Scene/Walmart deal went so badly that most of OWOO's principals quit and the company ceased all doll production.

The Empire, Smithsonian Institute and SmileyWorld licenses are active and dolls will be made which should have far greater success than the 1st dolls based on the new characters that people know and love... so who cares if the initial product launch didn't sell-out as everyone had hoped? No point in crying over spilled milk... we're all grown ups here.

Why would anybody "tip their hat" to a company that has lost millions of dollars of investor funds, lost money on every unit sold, and is up to its eyeballs in delinquent notes?

Every OTC company makes the same mistake, takes capital from Ashers' and the share price tanks (can't blame the companies for limited funding options). TONR is one the few I've ever seen go to war with the toxic guys and get a judgement against the convertibles. That's why.

Your explanation of OTC funding had a major flaw. You say that private funding dries up, so toxic convertible funding is the only option, but now that has *poof* just disappeared, and now private lenders are suddenly ready to rush back to TONR's side

Private funding normally dries up, yes. Toxic funding is virtually the only option left after that. And, yes, private investors will invest again if the share price is active and back at 005-01 absolutely, especially with the toxic guys OUT! Whether it's new investors or not, I don't know, but obviously TONR is confident they have that figured out based on today's PR.

Kinda like Trent destroyed this company? This thing had a lot of potential, but he blew it.

The toxic financing crushed the stock price like with virtually every other OTC company and then people with a personal vendetta against the company like to accuse the officers of crushing the stock in stead of the toxic guys. It never gets old :)

I think this is one last big push allowing some of these debentures to convert.

Don't think too hard.

TONR might buy some more time with a reverse split if they decide to make a go of it

Silly prediction. A R/S with this float that's under 500M and O/S just over 600M would be plain silly. Take a look at Mj*a trading at 10+ cents with over 4B in the float year after year. It's good liquidity to have shares in the float with no convertibles. TONR has a perfect share structure, and perfect liquidity. Doing a R/S would wipe out the liquidity and make the stock unattractive to new investors.