Pegs,
CHS v.s. monosilane (which is a billion dollar material): This also talks about CHS and the lower temperature for decomposition, I think this is the advantage Coretecs CHS has over everyone out there but maybe a little hard to understand the significance of it this aspect of CHS. It seems this allows it to be be used for more applications than other materials because of this aspect of it that keep other silicon materials from being effective in many ways. In other words silicon based anodes work far better than graphite but cracking and fracturing during lithiation has kept it on the shelf but CHS has solved that major problem many have been trying to over come for years now so Coretec can be a leader in replacing graphite anodes with their materials which would be huge!!
A key advantage of CHS is being a liquid precursor to silicon-containing electronic materials versus the commonly used gaseous monosilane (SiH4). As a liquid precursor, CHS offers the ability to use solution-based processing routes leading to safer handling, more efficient materials utilization, significant cost savings and performance enhancing material structures. Another key advantage of CHS is the lower temperature for decomposition of CHS to silicon, leading to the use of a broader range of substrates, many of which are lower cost. Monosilane requires high temperatures (500 - 800°C) for decomposition to silicon, whereas CHS forms silicon at temperatures as low as 300°C. In addition, during the decomposition of CHS, the rate at which silicon is formed increases by a factor of six relative to monosilane, leading to significant cost savings due to the increased rate of production. The company anticipates that CHS will first be used as an alternative to current methods to introducing silicon into lithium ion batteries or when manufacturing silicon-based microelectronics and printable/flexible electronics.