The sam registration and the fact that SFOR can't meet the "contractor eligibility requirements" (specifically the financial review), added to the fact that their financials show no money from the DOD, and there has been no "official announcement" of a deal with the DOD (and I don't think there will be, because of some of the reasons listed above,) is what I am basing my "no DOD contracts for SFOR" counter argument on.
The DOD money in 2017 is a friendly wager, and the 2017 timeframe is based off of what the "chearleaders" have proclaimed "yuge deals in 2nd half of 2017", "E-mailed the POTUS myself, DOD deals Imminent" is going to or is happening now.
Basically, I am just seeing if they are willing to stand behind what they're posting, and so far only a few posters have agreed. The chearleaders RUN and make excuses on why they won't make a friendly lil wager.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
