InvestorsHub Logo

BBANBOB

06/26/17 1:02 PM

#480736 RE: katekir1234 #480734

Sorry but I have a RIGHT TO CHANGE MY MIND
I for MYSELF have come to the conclusion that there will be VERY VERY LITTLE LEFT <<<IN THE BK OF WMB>>> to pay squat, or for that MATTER IN WMI as they were not asets held BY and IN CONTROL OF WMI being in safe harbor

WMB and WMLT 2 diff animals, and IFIN ya believe there are assets HELD OFF BOOK safe HARBOR, then ifin ya know it or not YOU TOO AGREE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WMB didn't have much or it would have been brought up in court as I have said 1000 time over, and at the same time in WMI's BK case NOR DID THEY as to qualify as a SPE they had to NOT HAVE control or ownership of those assets or they would have shown in our BK.....

Hey I am a slow DA OKIE so I may be way out in left field on a tree limb ,but that is my opinion NOW


JUSTIN Nelson pushed the issue several times and got shot down each time,but he did this for a reason,TO CLUE THE JUDGE IN imho

BBANBOB

06/26/17 1:10 PM

#480740 RE: katekir1234 #480734

Then HOLD YOUR BREATH
I for one say little if anything else come to the PIERS and I HOLD PIERS!!!!

In short maybe this will help............

I really don't care if .10 comes from either WMB/WMI's BK cases,because what we think is there isn't involved in either of those cases directly as assets considered owned by EITHER,or you would have seen them listed in the case.....

Remember this was a set up so that only the H's survived and received all the left overs that WOULD APPEAR K MART style only after all was said and done.....................Our supposed money was being held outside of both of those BK cases IMHO