Replies to post #38706 on Tauriga Sciences Inc (fka TAUG)

[Johnny_C]

There have been a few other provable liable statements made and I hope when TAUG wraps these cases up they sue Berman and Decn and a couple others. Lol

Make it a great day

[diannedawn]

I said...and I think it's pretty CLEAR...

Whatta surprise...
Apparently both the shareholders and Cowan, are just supposed to take BSeth's "word" for what the original terms of the Note were?

Like I said before, people will do crazy stuff for money.
Is it inconceivable that a company in the midst of a lawsuit and claiming "millions" in damages,
would recreate a document to help their case????
I don't think so.

HOW can they prove it is the original document if it was never filed?
Seriously...are the notes notarized? Is there any PROOF of the signing?

Maybe it's just my distrusting nature...
Or maybe it's what I saw play out those final days in July 2015...
the word ORCHESTRATED comes to mind.

But I do not believe Seth Shaw, or the others in management here, are "100%" honest or honorable.
Between what I've seen here and at TAUG's one time "jv partner" BVAP...
Yeah...I do not think so.

Just my opinion...but it is based on things that are provable.

Care to answer any of the QUESTIONS?
Care to show us PROOF?

All these QUESTIONS COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED...
IF Seth M. Shaw had FILED THE NOTE ON JULY 17, 2015 WITH THE SEC.
There was a 8k filed that day...but the Note was not even mentioned in that filing.
Instead it was snuck into the DEF14A...
You know...the one that Seth M. Shaw DECLARED to be "100% accurate"
and then, about 10 months later, filed a CORRECTION for...

Everything discolsed in our Proxy mailing from July 17, 2015 was 100% accurate based on the information we had available to us on July 17, 2015.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=116013742&txt2find=typenex

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1142790/000149315216008806/form8-k.htm

But this is typical...BSeth COULD HAVE told the truth back in August 2015...
Said..."ooops! I guess we made a small mistake in the proxy"...
INSTEAD he made things infinitely worst by trying to AVOID.
He LIED.

If I have these questions about the Note; do you think Cowan's attorneys will not?