Replies to post #32944 on POW! Entertainment Inc. (fka POWN)

[rickn23]

I think there are several factors causing Camsing's share price rise.

A lot of the merger news was done by Chinese news outlets. They pushed the idea that POW! has (over?) 270 IPs and 1000 characters. Camsing mentioned they want to become like Marvel (Disney bought Marvel for $4.2 billion US).

There was also Focus Media buying Ricco Media Holdings (owned 75% of Stan Lee Global (30 (POW!?) IPs) for $100 million HK (about $13 million US).

Valuing POW!'s 270 IPs based, strictly on the Focus Media deal, assuming all 30 IPs were POW!'s (which is likely since POW! owns the other 25% of Stan Lee Global), The IP would be worth around $156 million US ($1.2 billion HK), maybe minus the Focus Media IP. maybe). That doesn't include POW!'s other assets, Stan's name and likeness, which could be worth a few million.

There is also the likelihood that Camsing is better equipped to profitize (is that a word?) POW!'s IP, than POW!.

Stan has also done, at least one interview saying that "The Annihilator" is filming. If, it were, Camsing would see more immediate monetary benefits than starting from scratch.

end of part 1 of 2

[rickn23]

I think we can always sue as long as we don't wait beyond any statue of limitations. To use a metaphor, I think Stan and Gill are in a hole and they keep digging. (edited) I've previously outlined some of the stuff, I think they have done. I think they might be doing other things with the buyout, but, I can't prove anything until the buyout occurs.

I think a good case can be made against them, but, they might not be through and could be doing things that would make a stronger case. I think POW! would be better off, if Stan and Gill not hampered the company by their actions.

If, POW! were getting the revenue generated by Stan's photo opportunity business, POW! could have been showing a profit for years. If, Stan, Gill, and Art had allowed Barth and Sandman to sell their shares, POW! would have had an additional $1.6 million (?), from them paying off on the subscription.

But, getting "fair value" for our shares may be a matter of exercising "dissenter rights", especially if the company can be valued on the value of it's assets.

end of part 2.

[firehorse]

Wouldn't it be hard to argue with a 100% to 400% premium to the trading price at time of acquisition? Seems like anything above .025 is a substantial premium.